This petition will run to the 8th August 2018 and when it reaches 10,000 signatures the Government will respond (currently awaited).
At 100,000 signatures the petition will be considered for debate in parliament.
Please sign and share - CLICK HERE
Reclassify the theft of a pet to a specific crime in its own right.
Review the sentencing guidelines for theft offences, so that where the theft of a family pet is involved, monetary value is irrelevant for the categorisation of the crime for sentencing purposes.
Ensure Police Forces are given appropriate guidance and training to record and investigate cases.
More than 60 dogs are stolen every week in England and Wales. Less than 5% of cases lead to convictions.
Pet theft is currently seen as no different to the theft of an inanimate object - despite pets being sentient beings. The theft of pets is generally categorised as robbery or burglary, but lead to minimal sentences. Enforcement of existing laws do not currently act as a deterrent or fit the crime itself.
The UK Government Petition (currently open) asks to change the laws governing the use of fireworks to include a ban on public use: UK Government Petition can be found hereit runs for six months closing on the 6th April 2018.
"Fireworks cause alarm, distress and anxiety to many people and animals. We call on the Secretary of State to make appropriate provision to secure that the risk of public use is the MINIMUM that is compatible with fireworks being used, as stated in Fireworks Act 2003 sect 2."
As the petition has gained over 100k signatures, the Government has issued the following written response below and debated the issue in Parliament on the 29th January 2018:
The fireworks parliamentary debate can be found here. Government Response: Government takes the issue of firework safety very seriously. There is legislation in place that controls the sale, use and misuse of fireworks; we have no plans to extend this further.
The Government takes the issue of firework safety very seriously. There is legislation in place relating to the supply, storage, possession and use and misuse of fireworks. This includes legislation which regulates the supply and use of fireworks, both for the general public and professional display operators. Restrictions on the sale and use of fireworks are set out under the 2003 Fireworks Act, the Fireworks Regulations 2004 and the Pyrotechnic Articles (Safety) Regulations 2015. These contain provisions to minimise the risk of fireworks harming people, property and animals. Although a small minority of people use fireworks in a dangerous, inconsiderate or anti-social manner, we believe that the majority use them sensibly and responsibly.
The Government is aware of concerns about the distress noisy fireworks can cause to individuals, as well as to livestock, pets and wildlife. Therefore, the Government urges those using fireworks to be considerate to their neighbours and give sufficient notice of firework use, particularly to those who are vulnerable such as older people, children, those with mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and those with pets and livestock. We have worked with the fireworks industry to encourage users of fireworks to give notice of their displays so that those who are vulnerable or keep animals can make arrangements for their safety.
The Blue Cross animal charity has also produced information on animals and fireworks, which gives advice on how to avoid or reduce stress to animals when fireworks are being set off. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) and the Kennel Club provide similar advice on their websites concerning how to minimise the impact of fireworks use on animals.
There is already a ban on the general public from purchasing fireworks with higher levels of risk and noise and seasonal limitations on their sale. The Fireworks Regulations 2004 restrict their sale to the traditional fireworks periods around 5th November, Diwali, New Year’s Eve and the Chinese New Year. These are an important part of British tradition reflecting our history and multi-culturalism. While it is possible to buy fireworks at other times of the year, a ‘licence to sell fireworks’ is required and strict conditions are imposed outside the traditional periods.
At present any firework that exceeds 120 decibels must not be supplied to consumers. There are also low noise fireworks available that consumers can choose to buy, but we do not propose to bring in regulations to require all fireworks to be low noise.
Government acknowledges that many people have genuine concerns about the use and, the misuse, of fireworks and the risks of firework-related injury. However, the number of injuries is low and the total number of hospital admissions caused by firework injuries has remained below 200 a year for the last 10 years.
The Government does not plan to make any changes to the way statistics relating to enforcement actions are collected. The Government believes the focus of enforcement should be on delivering necessary protections and on working with businesses, citizens and others to ensure safety.
The Government believes that the current regulations strike the right balance between the enjoyment of fireworks by the public and restricting the sale and use of fireworks for public safety reasons.
The best way to continue to reduce the distress caused by fireworks is to work with industry, retailers and others to promote the safe and responsible use of fireworks through guidance and public education and to ensure that appropriate action is taken against those that break the rules.
The obligations for the Secretary of State referred to in the e-petition, to publish a regulatory Impact Assessment and to consult interested organisations, only apply when making new regulations and we have no plans to change the legislation relating to fireworks.
As set out above, given there is already legislation in place which controls the sale and use and misuse of fireworks; we have no plans to extend this further.
Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
The Scottish government has recently confirmed that the use of electric shock collars on dogs is to be banned in Scotland.
The announcement follows a campaign by MSPs as well as organisations including the Kennel Club, the Scottish SPCA and the Dogs Trust.
Initial draft guidance been published with the ban to be introduced through guidance issued under the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006 in the coming months.
Draft guidance states that: "Causing unnecessary suffering is an offence under the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006. This includes suffering caused by inappropriate training methods."
Once the guidance has been finalised, the courts will be able to take it into account when establishing liability in a prosecution.
The Scottish government previously said (November 2017) that it would tighten the restrictions but would allow their use under supervision, a qualification for those using the device was to be recognised, this will now not be created.
The collars are not banned in England, but are in Wales.
Scottish Government Policy is as follows:
In light of concern regarding the potential misuse of electronic training collars (e-collars), we intend to issue Guidance on these and other training methods under Section 38 of the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006.
We will issue guidance, under that Act, to make it clear that training which includes unpleasant stimuli or physical punishment can cause pain, suffering and distress and that any such pain, suffering and distress caused by an inappropriate training method, including electronic collars, may constitute the offence of causing unnecessary suffering under that Act.
This guidance, once finalised, may be considered relevant in a future prosecution. Although the guidance is advisory, a court may take into account compliance or non-compliance with the guidance in establishing liability in a prosecution.
In due course this guidance may be incorporated into a revised Code of Practice or wider Guidance for the welfare of dogs, along with additional guidance on other topics of dog welfare not currently covered in detail in the Code of Practice for the Welfare of Dogs.
The proposed draft wording is:
“Training which includes unpleasant stimuli or physical punishment can cause pain, suffering and distress.
These techniques can compromise dog welfare, lead to aggressive responses and worsen the problems that they aim to address. Particular methods to avoid include: physical punishment, including the use of electronic collars to administer an electric shock; anti-bark collars, which may mask or aggravate underlying behavioural or health issues; and any device that squirts noxious oils or other chemicals that interfere with your dog’s acute sense of smell.
Causing unnecessary suffering is an offence under the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006. This includes suffering caused by inappropriate training methods.”
We would welcome comments on this proposed guidance, particularly from those responsible for enforcing the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006 who may be asked to consider whether or not such methods have been used in a manner that contravenes the Act and compromises animal welfare.
Dog lovers have united worldwide in peaceful protests,
rallies and awareness days which have taken place in a united global day of
anti-breed specific legislation events this month.
The UK joined the global day of action once again and
London took part with a peaceful protest, the Westminster event was held on
Saturday 15th July and there were also awareness day events in Coventry West
Midlands and Cardiff, Wales.
The Westminster protest was organised by DDA Watch Ltd, a
campaign group which helps and supports dogs and their families affected by the
Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 and this years' event marked 26 years of failed, unjust
dog law in the UK.
Ottawa, Winnipeg, Ontario, Halifax, Montreal, Toronto,
Barrie, Truro, Nova Scotia in Canada and Germany also held anti-BSL events for
the 15th July as part of the Global Anti-breed specific legislation issue
affecting dogs and their families world wide.
Dog lovers travelled across the UK to unite and take a
stand for innocent dogs and to call for a repeal of a failed piece of
legislation that targets types of dogs and condemns them as 'dangerous' based
on their physical appearance.
The Westminster protest was a grass-roots gathering, with
volunteers present who actively campaign and support innocent dogs and their
families being torn apart by breed specific legislation on a daily basis.
Attending to support the event was veterinary surgeon and
animal behaviourist Dr Kendal Shepherd MRCVS, canine behaviourists Robert
Alleyne and Jordan Shelley and dog trainer for film, television and stage
productions, Robert Stuhldreer with his beautiful assistance dog Flora. One
supporter was dressed as the 'Grim Reaper' with a message for Defra attached to
the black outfit which said 'I am Breed Specific Legislation' and gave out
information leaflets to those passing by outside the Parliamentary buildings.
Giving out plenty of canine kisses was the beautiful
Staffie named 'Whippet', a Battersea Dogs Home Ambassadog who came along to
support the event with her mum, Chris McLean. Whippet wore her special pink
coat with the words 'Breed Specific Legislation Murders My Friends' written on
it, raising awareness for her doggy pals.
At the event in central London, there was a large white
sheet headed ‘People’s Messages to Defra – 26 Years of Tears’ and dog lovers
wrote their own personal messages to be sent to Government; some in memory of
much loved dogs who had never put a paw wrong and have been killed by the
Another precious dog named Paul was remembered,
heartbreakingly his casket of ashes was brought to the protest to show the end
result of many dogs affected by this harsh and unfair legislation. Paul had
lost his life in 2015 and campaigners shed tears as his casket was placed in
remembrance at the event.
Banners and placards were held high just outside the
mighty buildings of Westminster where the law which condemns dogs based on
their appearance was first passed 26 years ago; a young supporter who had
travelled a considerable distance held up a photograph of Lennox, a canine
victim of breed specific legislation from Northern Ireland whose death five
years ago this month had sparked global outrage and condemnation, bringing the
injustices of the legislation to the attention of thousands of people across
the world and leaving a legacy of hope that disastrous BSL will one day end.
Two supporters from Devon held up their placard for a
much loved dog named Sky who is held incarcerated and caught up in a legal
nightmare due to BSL.
Another innocent dog named Blitz who has been tragically
sentenced to death under the barbaric law and endured two and a half years
imprisoned on canine death row was remembered and many members of the public
were shocked to learn that this is what can and often does happen in the UK and
overseas, to pet dogs who have never bitten or hurt anyone. Several people who
stopped to speak to the campaigners expressed their disgust and shock that this
legislation exists in Great Britain and other parts of the world.
Over two thousand DDA Watch leaflets were distributed in
central London and further petition signatures were gained to help create
awareness of the situation which campaigners say is long overdue for repeal.
Maria Daines, a Director of DDA Watch and one of the
event organisers said: 'It is high time breed specific legislation was at least
extensively debated in parliament with a view to repealing section 1 (DDA)
which has proven over 26 years to be ineffective, unfair and cruel to the dogs
and families affected by it. Education (as opposed to prohibitive legislation)
is necessary and helps to keep dog owners, the public and canine companions
safe; Banning, restricting and killing dogs that look a certain way is
ridiculously outdated, heartbreaking for many and a waste of public money. In
2017, we can and should be doing much better for our canine friends, their
families, the public and those who work with dogs, including stray and rescue
Royal Mail and the Communication Workers Union are launching their annual dog awareness week 3 – 7 July.
As the UK school break for their summer holidays, families enjoy the summer weather, which is good news for them but BAD NEWS FOR POSTAL WORKERS as this signals what Posties know as the ‘dog-bite season’ and the time of the year which traditionally sees a big spike in the number of attacks.
Royal Mail and postal workers trade union the CWU will be campaigning again to raise public awareness and urge customers to be responsible dog owners as well as urge caution amongst postmen and women who want to provide a good service but sometimes pay a heavy price.
CWU National Health and Safety Officer Dave Joyce said: "Seven postal workers are attacked by dogs every day of the year. It is unacceptable and the whole idea of Dog Awareness Week is to highlight the problem and the repercussions for dog owners and the victims, many of whom are seriously injured and some can not return to mail delivery work”.
“Over 70% of Dog Attacks on Postmen and Women occur on the garden path or at the doorstep of the dog owners home. It just needs owners to restrict their animals access to the front garden or to put their dog in another room before opening the door to collect a parcel or sign for an item.”
“Customers are always pleased to see the Postman or Postwoman arrive as they’re eager to take delivery of their goods they’ve ordered and paid for on the internet but thousands of customers who own a dog unfortunately don’t give a second thought to the Postal Worker’s safety by putting the dog in a safe, secure place.”
“The vast majority of our customers and their dogs aren't a problem but irresponsible and reckless dog owners are.”
“The new dog control laws now identify and penalises irresponsible dog owners and many are now facing prosecution and paying heavy court penalties and end up withcriminal records. So it’s in their best interest in more ways than one to make sure the dog don’t bite the Postman.”
“One Essex dog owner was recently fined £8,800 after his dog injured a Postwoman’s fingers as she put letters through the door – which is another problem Postal workers face!”
“The penalties can also include losing their dogs, being banned from dog ownership, paying compensation and even a Jail sentence.”
“Dog owners need to fully understand that their actions usually are the cause of a dog being dangerous and simple precautions can prevent the pain for everyone concerned. No matter what breed of dog is involved, the dog can present a substantial danger to postal workers."
Top tips for dog owners to help the postman or woman deliver the post in safety: • Keep your dog indoors around the time that the postman calls to deliver mail.
• Before you opened the door to collect a parcel or sign for an item - put your dog in another room.
• Make sure children don’t open the door, as dogs can push by them and attack the postman.
• If you have a back garden, close off the access, so your dog can't get round to the front when the postman calls.
• If your dog attacks the mail and could bite a postman’s fingers as he puts mail through your letterbox, please fit a letter box cage.
• If it’s not practical for you to keep your dog away from a postman delivering your mail, consider fitting a secure mailbox on the edge of your property.
Quebec's proposed Bill 128 would be catastrophic - please sign the petition against it. The proposed law, Bill 128, is the start of a gradual approach to legislating breeds in Quebec, according to Quebec Public Security Minister Martin Coiteux, who introduced it last week. Eventually the provincial government will be allowed to ban any ol’ breed of dog it decides is “dangerous.”
“Should Bill 128 pass, the result will therefore be the systematic, large-scale putting to death of dogs in shelters across the province,” stated the Montreal SPCA in an April 14 press release that said the ban would have “catastrophic consequences.”